Fifty years ago I wrote a short magazine piece on the hidden agendas of conferences. I argued that "for professional people personal satisfaction at conferences depends on the fulfillment, or movement toward fulfillment, of three familiar needs:
*Recognition - respect, status
*Affiliation - belonging, communication
*Audience - a platform, witnesses
I think this is still more or less true. But in the area of recognition, I may have cheated a bit. Looking back on my career, I notice that I often hung out with presidents and deans and leaders of organizations. I was pleased and a bit surprized to be seen and sought out by them. But I didn't risk running for high office or accepting terribly responsible positions myself. Unconciously I basked in prestige by association.
Lots of ambient glory, plenty of cocktails in penthouses, and without the blood, sweat and tears.
When people asked why I didn't try for any of those important jobs myself, I always said "I hate administration' or 'I wouldn't want that responsibility', or 'I hate marketing myself'. And that was true. Or maybe I was not ambitious enough, or fearful of failure?
In any case I often satisfied my need for recognition, affiliation, and audience... by association.
Comments